Received: by 2002:ab2:6991:0:b0:1f7:f6c3:9cb1 with SMTP id v17csp685038lqo; Wed, 8 May 2024 11:27:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCV/JRt5rhwWfoY06pAjgWV1C3r6vhUsmvC389SxjWIJNC1n7nYgyh/P+FexiRjgGkhvdAxl5MqkYaeY5yQYYGDGxQys9b/VC1gfhhPzWA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHFhtYN8my57bEsfJaIoIYjNcVqA3bpC6sJ2N4gkJ/Iht6r0GseM32SCR+Mt+uBnACcFqro X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ec91:b0:1eb:3ef7:1237 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1eeb059f19bmr32991695ad.50.1715192876132; Wed, 08 May 2024 11:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i8-20020a170902cf0800b001eb6280cc26si13159987plg.72.2024.05.08.11.27.55 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 May 2024 11:27:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-173698-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=H4dHBcmI; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-173698-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-173698-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBA9A286D0E for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 18:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C9712DD9A; Wed, 8 May 2024 18:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="H4dHBcmI" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB3EA12BE9E; Wed, 8 May 2024 18:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715192865; cv=none; b=MYznzFf4V90bq2xauUrWjYuaZ/pG8IJBSnTrztzFbAN1XAdgCmUOrluzmCkJr4dXdDrBokmBM9gBoH3xJi5rLD6XCCQlXduXKEmvcSgRuPkdsJMTgtNlXFBmJU3rpCYIGWBQIgORefo4B9DzSuLKmvwSrloZ8kD6LrczonUVmd4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715192865; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TQyn2lCiksoMNY+L3Cmit5xvgMlOchLg/3HXre8evts=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=edsEDS3j0RPY+BwoUi8S8U7Fr9lsZ7L32QqNlYUlzOXfyI2d8VwO9e55GZBMaCUZRFXEEF4dQ+O5bEAzJuwsZzvemqb2c6voH++gKGVDAatp7rWfRwMbf/BhHH6F4e+wBjjHtwD6dXQBC07/IbyjGh6UYYRnDUg1KHGtRe+sBPY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=H4dHBcmI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715192864; x=1746728864; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=TQyn2lCiksoMNY+L3Cmit5xvgMlOchLg/3HXre8evts=; b=H4dHBcmI0CQIMpvcgBLfLZ0c69k+BzZv6LIpTb17DmNnAyJYtRhO6xR5 wLr/C0n8GZTKdQNAd36muZiLm4SNdlhE+SG+ZIvy/QGGY0jqzH/HuXLwL RYfpGh0a9IABSSlmo9VSUX5wQ3nW9r7RD0r+OT1FiaGF9dw2aibjDz9sD lNmcKFnGRDPx0AK+UvxNUidISEwCav2L/PfSZ2eyqLN1Fvs0BgSiTw0dj gQXsjoum2MW9Y4WpZvtp6+9zJtXdKUI2qdPzRRbU28+6dET6V7Dq4/IwZ VhJNiuhhAWFvEipK8lAzmZkUcv388wVbkexZUXnaOWy9ewUNaqDOpawgd Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HHU7tMSuRsmdxVylYmK5TQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UrZviiP8Qdi+uEx9eP8HZQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11067"; a="21746829" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,145,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="21746829" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2024 11:27:43 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: pPHW8MKiSkaurGKf+8RAmQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6/g+hsMwS+mdRwVMUlc4Pg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,145,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="33526172" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2024 11:27:38 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1s4m0t-00000005XUW-2oGJ; Wed, 08 May 2024 21:27:35 +0300 Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 21:27:35 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jacob Keller Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Alexander Lobakin , Richard Cochran , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Aleksandr Loktionov Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile Message-ID: References: <20240508180057.1947637-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1f2eb3d5-649d-4723-af89-ca625070877d@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1f2eb3d5-649d-4723-af89-ca625070877d@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:23:39AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > On 5/8/2024 11:00 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: .. > FWIW I applied v1 and v2, and got only the following range-diff: > This matches the changes described w.r.t ordering, and everything built > properly when I tested it on my test kernel tree. > > Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko