Received: by 2002:ab2:6991:0:b0:1f7:f6c3:9cb1 with SMTP id v17csp692249lqo; Wed, 8 May 2024 11:42:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCVeesboeyyFeT0aKGsTqJS+8HCqSQ1Fc2aUF2sWFQ5bzn+qnZqLT1nJrkUOYAr8vpPTTFTQcewBzNp/Lg/6RSQESKumG5YEsVGR9qLZ2g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHaGOowlg00Y4+CeeXbni0CV7Bkj7IZmJBSKM7jV1jE+yBrIkC5QpKsrmKMtSRMujgHtQxt X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1c8:b0:1ed:36dc:a570 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1eeb078e519mr41235715ad.49.1715193719998; Wed, 08 May 2024 11:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r17-20020a170902e3d100b001e3e64fb474si12520064ple.213.2024.05.08.11.41.59 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 May 2024 11:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-173700-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="CPuir/jw"; arc=fail (body hash mismatch); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-173700-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-173700-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86382B25D21 for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 18:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9443C12CDBC; Wed, 8 May 2024 18:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CPuir/jw" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A89EE54FAA for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 18:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715192946; cv=none; b=U0wKFDpEbrplR/Y2scPc1i5LpBvriEmxDezW9iRFZdt2coNGKMKpf+Qf9AlNP67vY0LlzjtovonYn8AXm+KMzbSc7I6+CKR0/0JPa9u9E/h7L2H1hOuWOS+tFD9dTvwwFwQOLtfiZlsPQDtyN9D+n6bdodQbd35eY+QaeIp9wh0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715192946; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w3kZgmXnnJRsJLju+dT3OUItaJu9Z1c9zg2md9E1tiA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=X6am5Kh+aQ5NPtEgsx51bZ5WosH3Y+si/Ljk43DxDFsc8BQ4fBxHNDTl51/01CKVkEm1bwTImhOvyvTx4svUyzoN4omz+XWN1KJMoE8RHP6AAzqQfHlFfdWQljlbJL3ysQ9fofe0jMCkyFfUSx5xCeJoo876d96uNwk4SslXEdU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=CPuir/jw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715192945; x=1746728945; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=w3kZgmXnnJRsJLju+dT3OUItaJu9Z1c9zg2md9E1tiA=; b=CPuir/jw0T5x0y3CwrqVYvfxvjS6ekUJpVKa38FPCoUBfaOFNPA86yTR gzq4W76NDcj/WN8rpbPDUZWyamSUAa/z2ZD7uVzE29wu5uO7EjPZ7xQ7C PSHmgGzbWNyLVeGLgOhqDKD9ZulN7w+MxHJiUcI0eR4kdGbvbPIdp2ztT MzMHzT1pPoEagvGWiSogjJTsytphZ8fhIdTovBiBZiDB71BZcYgshzyi8 2SATfLD6f+9e4HJCkiHrL5EdVCLPK+AcA2ZHwQI7LlQyvuJ3rNHdKEL34 QBQMyqSCtbemWmpvQ1XYKPDSqAMMq1eMFTbArvi/P4HynNgr542T17yXv w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hzJ94pHHToyv0X9zxn+6Tg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OA8u0srZTFy7SpDXvfSMsQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11067"; a="11231592" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,145,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="11231592" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2024 11:29:04 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: y332NT5ATcS/PqALfhLjhA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: GaWUBkhQQbq3B1arheGwqA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,145,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="59840609" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2024 11:29:02 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1s4m2E-00000005XVd-3wSo; Wed, 08 May 2024 21:28:58 +0300 Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 21:28:58 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Miquel Raynal , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] eeprom: 93xx46: drop unneeded MODULE_ALIAS Message-ID: References: <20240414154957.127113-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20240414154957.127113-3-krzk@kernel.org> <6599e2a3-3b04-4ea2-aa5c-a916b66c8009@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6599e2a3-3b04-4ea2-aa5c-a916b66c8009@kernel.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:15:00PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 08/05/2024 19:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 05:49:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> The ID table already has respective entry and MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE and > >> creates proper alias for SPI driver. Having another MODULE_ALIAS causes > >> the alias to be duplicated. .. > >> MODULE_ALIAS("spi:93xx46"); > > > > I was stumbled over this (leftover?). > > Commit message doesn't elaborate this bit. > > Any comments? > > It is not present in ID table and commit msg removes only duplicated > aliases. That alias has meaning - someone might be actually relying on it. It seems no users for it. The only user of platform data of this EEPROM uses board files which AFAIU bypasses modalias matching. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko