Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-174536-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 09:25:55 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Minor fixups for hugetlb fault path
Message-ID: <ZjzO4xH97Lu2UgEu@x1n>
References: <20240509100148.22384-1-osalvador@suse.de>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240509100148.22384-1-osalvador@suse.de>

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:01:46PM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> this series contains a couple of fixups for hugetlb_fault and hugetlb_wp
> respectively, where a VM_FAULT_SET_HINDEX call was missing.
> 
> I did not bother with a Fixes tag because the missing piece here is that
> we will not report to userspace the right extension of the faulty area
> by adjusting struct kernel_siginfo.si_addr_lsb, but I do not consider that
> to be a big issue because I assume that userspace already knows the size
> of the mapping anyway.

Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

-- 
Peter Xu