Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-174596-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 10:36:35 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfc 0/9] mm: memcg: separate legacy cgroup v1 code and
 put under config option
Message-ID: <20240509143635.GD374370@cmpxchg.org>
References: <20240509034138.2207186-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
 <20240509142205.GC374370@cmpxchg.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240509142205.GC374370@cmpxchg.org>

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:22:10AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:41:29PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > 3) Is it better to use a new include/linux/memcontrol-v1.h instead of
> >    mm/internal.h? Or mm/memcontrol-v1.h.
> 
> mm/memcontrol-v1.h sounds good to me.

Argh, there is a folio_memcg_lock() callsite in fs/buffer.c. I suppose
include/linux/memcontrol-v1.h makes the most sense then.