Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-174660-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 17:00:01 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Yazan Shhady <yazan.shhady@solid-run.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] dt-bindings: arm64: marvell: add solidrun cn9132
 CEX-7 evaluation board
Message-ID: <20240509-recycler-flask-0b3b7e2802f9@spud>
References: <20240509-cn9130-som-v5-0-95493eb5c79d@solid-run.com>
 <20240509-cn9130-som-v5-2-95493eb5c79d@solid-run.com>
 <5da207e2-1579-4056-9e3f-c25f5b14e225@solid-run.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtGJc9zRmffZ/WKF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5da207e2-1579-4056-9e3f-c25f5b14e225@solid-run.com>


--vtGJc9zRmffZ/WKF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:49:13AM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
> Am 09.05.24 um 12:46 schrieb Josua Mayer:
> > Add bindings for the SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 evaluation boar=
d.
> > The CEX is based on CN9130 SoC and includes two southbridges.
> >
> > Because CN9132 and 9131 are just names for different designs around the
> > same SoC, no soc compatibles beside marvell,cn9130 are needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@solid-run.com>
> > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml | 8 ++=
++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k=
=2Eyaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
> > index 74d935ea279c..538d91be8857 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
> > @@ -92,4 +92,12 @@ properties:
> >            - const: solidrun,cn9130-sr-som
> >            - const: marvell,cn9130
> > =20
> > +      - description:
> > +          SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 based single-board comput=
ers
> > +        items:
> > +          - enum:
> > +              - solidrun,cn9132-clearfog
> > +          - const: solidrun,cn9132-sr-cex7
> > +          - const: marvell,cn9130
> > +
> >  additionalProperties: true
> >
> It appears I will not be able to submit actual device-tree for this
> board. Therefore when applying this patch-set, it may be skipped.
>=20
> I am not sure about the policy in this case,
> if it is better to pick or skip.

What do you mean my "not be able to"? Does the device exist? If it does
then, I at least, have no objection to documenting a compatible for it.

Cheers,
Conor.

--vtGJc9zRmffZ/WKF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZjzzAQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0stTAP0Swn4g/aqRsQl4DdOnCMj2fHNKJe8wWaM1UzJWDe0ErAEAoUzKZ5J5wzKF
3vxTmwRcjr2FGSFSByz6l+/v4Q/Cqgk=
=4PBQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vtGJc9zRmffZ/WKF--