Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-174817-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Message-ID: <0abb541a45fd46aefb67d0a5dfd869230d8e3d95.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Early boot regression from f0551af0213 ("x86/topology: Ignore
 non-present APIC IDs in a present package")
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Linux regression tracking
 (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mario Limonciello
	 <mario.limonciello@amd.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Linux kernel
 regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 15:22:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <877cg4ppd5.ffs@tglx>
References: <3d77cb89857ee43a9c31249f4eab7196013bc4b4.camel@redhat.com>
	 <20240418082703.GCZiDZVyra7qOQbyqn@fat_crate.local>
	 <fd040809d95b3e12b2fdc78a2409e187716bc66f.camel@redhat.com>
	 <87plumxz4x.ffs@tglx>
	 <abbb7d7ca781f6c664e4c5b1dffc19394ac79691.camel@redhat.com>
	 <87le59vw1y.ffs@tglx>
	 <3a0afe545747e5314a9cb6bbaa9ce90b259ddfac.camel@redhat.com>
	 <87edautcmz.ffs@tglx>
	 <3b1d16e357c1f9badeef405366492f05af26c085.camel@redhat.com>
	 <878r11t8zu.ffs@tglx> <016902d9-3858-4c65-b3ec-f7a5103af63c@amd.com>
	 <51d0dff8-2888-463c-95ab-71b491f12a8f@leemhuis.info> <877cg4ppd5.ffs@tglx>
Organization: Red Hat Inc.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.1 (3.52.1-1.fc40) 
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0

So uh, apparently amazon decided that instead of using the shipping
address I have in their address book that is marked as "Default
Shipping Address" that it makes much more sense to sort all addresses
in the address book alphabetically, and then surprise me by sending it
to the first address in that list. which means the adapter got shipped
half way across the country and it's probably going to take me until at
least tomorrow to get a different one here, sorry :(.

Will get back to you with this info as soon as I can

On Wed, 2024-05-08 at 12:30 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, May 08 2024 at 10:38, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
> Leemhuis) wrote:
> > H! Lyude, Thomas, what's the status here? From here it looks like
> > we
> > were close to a fix, but then it turned out to be a bad fix -- and
> > afterwards nothing much seems to have happened. Did it fall through
> > the
> > cracks, or was this already fixed and I just missed that?
>=20
> I'm waiting for more data still.
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 tglx
>=20

--=20
Cheers,
 Lyude Paul (she/her)
 Software Engineer at Red Hat