Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-175238-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Message-ID: <21ffbcc7-1103-4481-af14-5ee8856b9625@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 11:14:20 +0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
 Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
 Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
 Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
 Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
 Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
 Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
 virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] iommu: Add attachment handle to struct iopf_group
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
References: <20240430145710.68112-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <20240430145710.68112-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <20240508000454.GM4718@ziepe.ca>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240508000454.GM4718@ziepe.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 5/8/24 8:04 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:57:04PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> @@ -206,8 +197,11 @@ void iommu_report_device_fault(struct device *dev, struct iopf_fault *evt)
>>   	if (group == &abort_group)
>>   		goto err_abort;
>>   
>> -	group->domain = get_domain_for_iopf(dev, fault);
>> -	if (!group->domain)
>> +	if (!(fault->prm.flags & IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID) ||
>> +	    get_attach_handle_for_iopf(dev, fault->prm.pasid, group))
>> +		get_attach_handle_for_iopf(dev, IOMMU_NO_PASID, group);
> That seems a bit weird looking?

Agreed.

> get_attach_handle_for_iopf(dev,
>     (fault->prm.flags &
>     IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID) ? fault->prm.pasid : IOMMU_NO_PASID,
>     group);

The logic here is that it tries the PASID domain and if it doesn't
exist, then tries the RID domain as well. I explained this in the commit
message:

"
.. if the pasid table of a device is wholly managed by user space,
there is no domain attached to the PASID of the device ...
"

Perhaps I can improve it like this,

	int rc = -EINVAL;
	...
	if (fault->prm.flags & IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID)
		rc = get_attach_handle_for_iopf(dev, fault->prm.pasid, group);
	if (rc)
		rc = get_attach_handle_for_iopf(dev, IOMMU_NO_PASID, group);

	if (rc || !group->attach_handle->domain->iopf_handler)
		goto err_abort;

Best regards,
baolu