Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-175426-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 10:10:03 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gthelen@google.coma,
	Chris Li <chriscli@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfc 0/9] mm: memcg: separate legacy cgroup v1 code and
 put under config option
Message-ID: <Zj3WWwJ-21xWqRcL@tiehlicka>
References: <20240509034138.2207186-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
 <jf44dfyaenz6xmn2hcodaginrshw5d5hfhmakdxtj4x6szk6b2@cr2rxamkgj2m>
 <edff9a60-a77f-bc6c-3d07-4f96a97f1e38@google.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <edff9a60-a77f-bc6c-3d07-4f96a97f1e38@google.com>

On Thu 09-05-24 19:59:19, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2024, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> 
> > Hi Roman,
> > 
> > A very timely and important topic and we should definitely talk about it
> > during LSFMM as well. I have been thinking about this problem for quite
> > sometime and I am getting more and more convinced that we should aim to
> > completely deprecate memcg-v1.
> > 
> 
> I think this would be a very worthwhile discussion at LSF/MM, I'm not sure 
> if it would be too late for someone to make a formal proposal for it to be 
> included in the schedule.  Michal would know if there is a opportunity.

yes, I think we can and should have this discussion. I will put that on
the schedule. I will reference this email thread as a topic proposal
with Shakeel and Roman to lead the session.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs