Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-175689-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 13:34:39 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: syzbot <syzbot+e25ef173c0758ea764de@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, 
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [fs?] WARNING in stashed_dentry_prune (2)
Message-ID: <20240510-blechnapf-bienen-b9b049b1bb28@brauner>
References: <0000000000009f0651061647bd5e@google.com>
 <000000000000decb7906180aae28@google.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <000000000000decb7906180aae28@google.com>

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 12:47:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> syzbot has bisected this issue to:
> 
> commit 2558e3b23112adb82a558bab616890a790a38bc6

So this sent me on a wild goose chase. In the last couple of weeks I got
multiple reports from syzbot (3-4, I think) that all reported bugs
reproduced against trees that were way behind mainline. So in this example:

#syz fix: pidfs: remove config option