Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-175778-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 13:28:29 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	=?utf-8?B?U8O4cmVu?= Andersen <san@skov.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: dsa: microchip: dcb: rename IPV to
 IPM
Message-ID: <20240510122829.GV2347895@kernel.org>
References: <20240510053828.2412516-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
 <20240510053828.2412516-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240510053828.2412516-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 07:38:26AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> IPV is added and used term in 802.1Qci PSFP and merged into 802.1Q (from
> 802.1Q-2018) for another functions.
> 
> Even it does similar operation holding temporal priority value
> internally (as it is named), because KSZ datasheet doesn't use the term
> of IPV (Internal Priority Value) and avoiding any confusion later when
> PSFP is in the Linux world, it is better to rename IPV to IPM (Internal
> Priority Mapping).
> 
> In addition, LAN937x documentation already use IPV for 802.1Qci PSFP
> related functionality.
> 
> Suggested-by: Woojung Huh <Woojung.Huh@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>