Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-176271-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 01:25:33 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, 
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, 
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com>, 
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>, 
	Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>, 
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 6/7] drm/panel: lg-sw43408: add missing error handling
Message-ID: <hf7u3rxard7yg2z3fkmntemhnnmwnsgmhmfhpt74modswg7nj4@7kwyba55x6o7>
References: <20240510-dsi-panels-upd-api-v1-0-317c78a0dcc8@linaro.org>
 <20240510-dsi-panels-upd-api-v1-6-317c78a0dcc8@linaro.org>
 <CAD=FV=Uu2=6c_3Q44BK384cgSLX=++_bBbg6=CCqBaXnqcEK=g@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=Uu2=6c_3Q44BK384cgSLX=++_bBbg6=CCqBaXnqcEK=g@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 02:47:05PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Add missing error handling for the mipi_dsi_ functions that actually
> > return error code instead of silently ignoring it.
> >
> > Fixes: 069a6c0e94f9 ("drm: panel: Add LG sw43408 panel driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-lg-sw43408.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Looks right to me. Only slight nit would be that I'd put this as the
> first patch in the series to make it obvious to anyone backporting it
> to older kernels that it doesn't have any dependencies on the earlier
> patches in the series. It's fairly obvious so this isn't a huge deal,
> but still could be nice.

Yes. I wanted to emphasise the _multi stuff rather than this fix. I'll
reorder patches for v2. Maybe I should also rebase the series on top of
patches by Cong Yang. WDYT?

> 
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry