Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763575AbYA3U1m (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:27:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755294AbYA3U1c (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:27:32 -0500 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:40430 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753546AbYA3U1a (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:27:30 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) Cc: Adrian Bunk , Pavel Roskin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jon Masters , Rusty Russell , Giridhar Pemmasani , rms@gnu.org Subject: Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:43:27 EST." <20080130194327.GC26257@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <1201641765.18773.35.camel@dv> <20080129225701.GS8767@does.not.exist> <1201650267.18773.118.camel@dv> <20080130002514.GA1802@does.not.exist> <1201658555.24898.27.camel@dv> <20080130175435.GA29368@does.not.exist> <20080130181530.GA26259@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20080130184538.GE29368@does.not.exist> <20080130194327.GC26257@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1201724787_2893P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:26:27 -0500 Message-ID: <6003.1201724787@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1644 Lines: 41 --==_Exmh_1201724787_2893P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:43:27 EST, Lennart Sorensen said: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 08:45:38PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > http://www.jbb.de/judgment_dc_munich_gpl.pdf > > http://www.jbb.de/judgment_dc_frankfurt_gpl.pdf > > Good point. They seem to be the place that actually has enforced the > GPL. An alternate reading is that it's the only place that has a legal system so whacked that a case actually went to trial rather than the offending party just going "Oh foo.. yeah, that *is* what it says, we better comply in one way or another"... It all depends what sort of legal system you have/want - I saw a statistic for our local police department that said that 98% of all their cases last year ended in plea agreements before going to trial (although to be fair, that includes traffic violations where the driver just paid the fine before the trial date came up and similar minor cases). If things actually go to trial all the time, things get even more bogged down than they already are... --==_Exmh_1201724787_2893P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFHoN1zcC3lWbTT17ARAo7hAKDQGDXpK9dcJJg3+suhKuE64A7jHgCdG+hI OyYyMGm28INiJzUbd8rGt3c= =xQ1D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1201724787_2893P-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/