Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-176716-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240511-msm-adreno-memory-region-v1-1-d73970717d42@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240511-msm-adreno-memory-region-v1-1-d73970717d42@gmail.com>
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 22:49:59 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA8EJprdnzvhx50DVHBRLZGkk4GNuCXaBiXt3wfNv-xm2AWOvg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/adreno: request memory region
To: Kiarash Hajian <kiarash8112hajian@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>, 
	Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, 
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Sat, 11 May 2024 at 22:35, Kiarash Hajian
<kiarash8112hajian@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The driver's memory regions are currently just ioremap()ed, but not
> reserved through a request. That's not a bug, but having the request is
> a little more robust.
>
> Implement the region-request through the corresponding managed
> devres-function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kiarash Hajian <kiarash8112hajian@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> index 8bea8ef26f77..aa83cb461a75 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> @@ -636,9 +636,9 @@ static void a6xx_gmu_rpmh_init(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>
>  err:
>         if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pdcptr))
> -               iounmap(pdcptr);
> +               devm_iounmap(&pdev->dev,pdcptr);
>         if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(seqptr))
> -               iounmap(seqptr);
> +               devm_iounmap(&pdev->dev,seqptr);

Is there any reason to keep devm_iounmap calls? IMO with the devres
management in place, there should be no need to unmap them manually.

>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ static void __iomem *a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
>                 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>         }
>
> -       ret = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
> +       ret = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>         if (!ret) {
>                 DRM_DEV_ERROR(&pdev->dev, "Unable to map the %s registers\n", name);
>                 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> @@ -1646,7 +1646,7 @@ int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>         dev_pm_domain_detach(gmu->cxpd, false);
>
>  err_mmio:
> -       iounmap(gmu->mmio);
> +       devm_iounmap(gmu->dev ,gmu->mmio);
>
>         /* Drop reference taken in of_find_device_by_node */
>         put_device(gmu->dev);
> @@ -1825,9 +1825,9 @@ int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>         dev_pm_domain_detach(gmu->cxpd, false);
>
>  err_mmio:
> -       iounmap(gmu->mmio);
> +       devm_iounmap(gmu->dev ,gmu->mmio);
>         if (platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "rscc"))
> -               iounmap(gmu->rscc);
> +               devm_iounmap(gmu->dev ,gmu->rscc);
>         free_irq(gmu->gmu_irq, gmu);
>         free_irq(gmu->hfi_irq, gmu);
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: cf87f46fd34d6c19283d9625a7822f20d90b64a4
> change-id: 20240511-msm-adreno-memory-region-2bcb1c958621
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Kiarash Hajian <kiarash8112hajian@gmail.com>
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry