Received: by 2002:ab2:6a05:0:b0:1f8:1780:a4ed with SMTP id w5csp1759692lqo; Sun, 12 May 2024 18:08:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCV5XGp8o4EDkgFqHczQz0h1+38v8ifv4qUYie3xwQpIg8JCDNyowt+07hIir/O1HYavrgpT6jzILsNwcUlHsF19yq72WWrB7SN74Oaq8A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGvMSOrRIK/04l6k0OFUdBh9NQYF0YxVymGnWgEWQ7FXuen0j1rKNT6pPpUjuFH1RQLbdFe X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:41c2:b0:1e4:6e70:25d8 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1ef43d2e2c3mr106482675ad.13.1715562480278; Sun, 12 May 2024 18:08:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1715562480; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pp4Tc/Zog1q/8o/8LWtMXm/Zq3jqweHc72CA4Q8hd7AxBvF14Xlm/J7AfR48CHa7MF XNkEGQ1Pp8dXfmJ60UKlAkukkVm/yCFe48rj/YqTdeK4QBRH7q701RHx3226wk8FMsF2 V2Zyd60nXqBU0CbidZshQ3I7Jp/5i6UjwfQSYtBnd7a6shO1IbKgbu+xTiUjYKocycms jqVEsMFhR7wuNX1xlyIkLFl5x6CTXzmJofnlWV7ucNoLPynbZPaptM2YbmJRlzFESgZU dgP2fjfQcPpKdgsxXOpUv6rhNrV8sbe+V6ZpfgRgB/9QH5QJWpeJTvSdN+PMHdpJ3lsF vWCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=4m6P5DzqA8so+cu7rXtxZX9zRgtX/pSS/kHNFecXgEU=; fh=J0SyGZhxSksiCaYBVPmVfYa3lojwJpSmPhTHdUogUkY=; b=kQRrjZo/mTzr2uCK4XRQh8yC9ClvngqOg7GMu1rjKYICiyiXmQEvFEjE36qmGO/uDh HcLNTc6IZHzhK3ySOm11CHsrRXL5/zB+SiAhgGabiQk0tr27rMD9yUeKKcdDxlQOgCg6 4/kiROjVUCwfFgBzNVI+mJQY+mqRj6XrAYTqvYs3qfjsfScXkUOAxP6s8QlbjI9+KEAs oGHL3gdtskD8ZgaeGyEOn1DVQoRuUhoU+cYzIpyxZr3X4im7GcxyNqxKeQHCVLI6pCYV G4FhhHWLoxTlez/40PfoNjpv0PzRHBBbMTHkUCA30usVwW3GcXMchTlPmnWu+aKdaUZ2 Qskw==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=L4tqIkJN; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-177071-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-177071-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d9443c01a7336-1ef0c038b3esi63741635ad.340.2024.05.12.18.07.59 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 12 May 2024 18:08:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-177071-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=L4tqIkJN; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-177071-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-177071-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15F3CB20CEE for ; Mon, 13 May 2024 01:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1BB107B3; Mon, 13 May 2024 01:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="L4tqIkJN" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90A7CE541 for ; Mon, 13 May 2024 01:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715562437; cv=none; b=hnntb6OdF0a5IRN6BmLyPVTuCiyTmQXy89uyXN/5xfCu7FZw2yUunnIoZZx10ptg1nXVyWLKCIbUsqGyFERTzy669LE9fj2r8YcCvfJt7T69hqyiDdSfbFfbhOepLW/zHd980gavV2gnrCOSYpERUBu90pk02yTbAurfRBvbSMM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715562437; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z5mJ1/5uug7AEPGBHrwQP1RnsDF46AQ6CEpaPD25I/o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hMXKYZ5jCj7np9pYSA0qtLC+xQxNO3HbpiPPtWYv+rM2rFrc0XSD8TSyfPLKIQ0nUIUDsI0Vji3qZeHgUggqmVu8thoTit19Lxu4+PUaqvTtYkaAJsD5pZQ6qe39UY/L1UlJ0iJeJHN8dMMXmmlDOMzHB+PXl+IwtGD0Y6yWR4o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=L4tqIkJN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1715562434; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4m6P5DzqA8so+cu7rXtxZX9zRgtX/pSS/kHNFecXgEU=; b=L4tqIkJNEYIt4j0p/7aaNZFErLQ+LLPSzvKM/AolAg5Zk3aBvt8q7K6y2cg+C6DfPtAkmy 14pUwrx1TqScUyHGC1DNU8IatzXgmqQ9amjaXbmti4KUlVlRrsFOfCc4yyT+Bjx4DxAi3j vAZozs0hOJL5PEK+lpuaucuCXYUzkO0= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-465-A_bfeSZ0NhqbI3YTU8cf1A-1; Sun, 12 May 2024 21:06:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: A_bfeSZ0NhqbI3YTU8cf1A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22CE485A58C; Mon, 13 May 2024 01:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tpad.localdomain (unknown [10.96.133.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C112103A3AA; Mon, 13 May 2024 01:06:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by tpad.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 16E0F400DF40C; Sun, 12 May 2024 18:44:23 -0300 (-03) Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 18:44:23 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: Leonardo Bras Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , "Paul E. McKenney" , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] kvm: Note an RCU quiescent state on guest exit Message-ID: References: <20240511020557.1198200-1-leobras@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240511020557.1198200-1-leobras@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.3 On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:05:56PM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > As of today, KVM notes a quiescent state only in guest entry, which is good > as it avoids the guest being interrupted for current RCU operations. > > While the guest vcpu runs, it can be interrupted by a timer IRQ that will > check for any RCU operations waiting for this CPU. In case there are any of > such, it invokes rcu_core() in order to sched-out the current thread and > note a quiescent state. > > This occasional schedule work will introduce tens of microsseconds of > latency, which is really bad for vcpus running latency-sensitive > applications, such as real-time workloads. > > So, note a quiescent state in guest exit, so the interrupted guests is able > to deal with any pending RCU operations before being required to invoke > rcu_core(), and thus avoid the overhead of related scheduler work. This does not properly fix the current problem, as RCU work might be scheduled after the VM exit, followed by a timer interrupt. Correct? > > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras > --- > > ps: A patch fixing this same issue was discussed in this thread: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240328171949.743211-1-leobras@redhat.com/ > > Also, this can be paired with a new RCU option (rcutree.nocb_patience_delay) > to avoid having invoke_rcu() being called on grace-periods starting between > guest exit and the timer IRQ. This RCU option is being discussed in a > sub-thread of this message: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/5fd66909-1250-4a91-aa71-93cb36ed4ad5@paulmck-laptop/ > > > include/linux/context_tracking.h | 6 ++++-- > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 10 +++++++++- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/context_tracking.h b/include/linux/context_tracking.h > index 6e76b9dba00e..8a78fabeafc3 100644 > --- a/include/linux/context_tracking.h > +++ b/include/linux/context_tracking.h > @@ -73,39 +73,41 @@ static inline void exception_exit(enum ctx_state prev_ctx) > } > > static __always_inline bool context_tracking_guest_enter(void) > { > if (context_tracking_enabled()) > __ct_user_enter(CONTEXT_GUEST); > > return context_tracking_enabled_this_cpu(); > } > > -static __always_inline void context_tracking_guest_exit(void) > +static __always_inline bool context_tracking_guest_exit(void) > { > if (context_tracking_enabled()) > __ct_user_exit(CONTEXT_GUEST); > + > + return context_tracking_enabled_this_cpu(); > } > > #define CT_WARN_ON(cond) WARN_ON(context_tracking_enabled() && (cond)) > > #else > static inline void user_enter(void) { } > static inline void user_exit(void) { } > static inline void user_enter_irqoff(void) { } > static inline void user_exit_irqoff(void) { } > static inline int exception_enter(void) { return 0; } > static inline void exception_exit(enum ctx_state prev_ctx) { } > static inline int ct_state(void) { return -1; } > static inline int __ct_state(void) { return -1; } > static __always_inline bool context_tracking_guest_enter(void) { return false; } > -static __always_inline void context_tracking_guest_exit(void) { } > +static __always_inline bool context_tracking_guest_exit(void) { return false; } > #define CT_WARN_ON(cond) do { } while (0) > #endif /* !CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_USER */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_USER_FORCE > extern void context_tracking_init(void); > #else > static inline void context_tracking_init(void) { } > #endif /* CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_USER_FORCE */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING_IDLE > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h > index 48f31dcd318a..e37724c44843 100644 > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h > @@ -480,21 +480,29 @@ static __always_inline void guest_state_enter_irqoff(void) > /* > * Exit guest context and exit an RCU extended quiescent state. > * > * Between guest_context_enter_irqoff() and guest_context_exit_irqoff() it is > * unsafe to use any code which may directly or indirectly use RCU, tracing > * (including IRQ flag tracing), or lockdep. All code in this period must be > * non-instrumentable. > */ > static __always_inline void guest_context_exit_irqoff(void) > { > - context_tracking_guest_exit(); > + /* > + * Guest mode is treated as a quiescent state, see > + * guest_context_enter_irqoff() for more details. > + */ > + if (!context_tracking_guest_exit()) { > + instrumentation_begin(); > + rcu_virt_note_context_switch(); > + instrumentation_end(); > + } > } > > /* > * Stop accounting time towards a guest. > * Must be called after exiting guest context. > */ > static __always_inline void guest_timing_exit_irqoff(void) > { > instrumentation_begin(); > /* Flush the guest cputime we spent on the guest */ > -- > 2.45.0 > > >