Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 14:41:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 14:41:48 -0500 Received: from web20504.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.139]:24837 "HELO web20504.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 5 Jan 2002 14:41:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20020105194140.67038.qmail@web20504.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 20:41:40 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?willy=20tarreau?= Subject: Re: Linux Kernel-2.4.18-nj1 To: Tom Rini Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020105180601.GC756@cpe-24-221-152-185.az.sprintbbd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Tom, > I'd actually argue against this. When Alan picked > up 2.2.x, there wasn't someone else doing an -ac'ish > 2.2 release as well. Right, but at 2.2 times, there were less features and less users than now. Preemption, PNPBios, Tux, schedulers, additionnal filesystems are many features that interest lots of people. Not that Alan did include them all either, but at least he gave the opportunity to test some of them (think about ext3 and pnpbios). > Marcelo is doing 2.4.x now, and seems to be doing a > good job of making sure stable stuff gets in, and > other stuff doesn't. The only patches that won't > make it into Marcelos tree in the very-near-term > (Which is all I'll speculate about) are the preempt > (and lock-break) patches. I totally agree. And that's why I find it still acceptable to have one tree (and not 1000) to test other features such as the ones above, so a large set of users can test them (eg: filesystems). > Please people, more trees are not always a better > thing when you're all doing the same thing. Perhaps people who have a solid personal tree would like to continue this discussion off-list and find an arrangement about a single test tree. Concerning stable trees, I think that both Marcello's and Andrea's are rock solid. Othe people may want to use their distributor's. I'll stop here to avoid decreasing the s/n ratio too much. Off-list correspondance OK. Regards, Willy PS: I really like your domain name, it could have been dedicated to my tree :-) ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en fran?ais ! Yahoo! Courrier : http://courrier.yahoo.fr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/