Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758085AbYAaBnZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:43:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752539AbYAaBnO (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:43:14 -0500 Received: from minbar.dodds.net ([66.93.39.86]:44275 "EHLO minbar.dodds.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752064AbYAaBnN (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:43:13 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 535 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:43:13 EST Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:34:15 -0800 From: Steve Langasek To: Adrian Bunk Cc: sfrench@samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove smbfs Message-ID: <20080131013415.GA3768@dario.dodds.net> References: <20080128220835.GF8767@does.not.exist> <200801302216.13788.linux@kukkukk.com> <20080130174103.17ff8197@tleilax.poochiereds.net> <20080130225810.GU29368@does.not.exist> <20080130193412.61c6e2e9@tleilax.poochiereds.net> <20080131004717.GX29368@does.not.exist> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080131004717.GX29368@does.not.exist> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1566 Lines: 32 On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 02:47:17AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > smbfs has the unfortunate quality of momentum. A lot of users aren't > > aware of CIFS at all since smbfs basically does what they need it to > > do. Some extra warning for those users would be nice. > And many users will start whining loudly that the not deprecated driver > (in this case cifs) has this or that bug not before the patch to finally > remove the deprecated feature got applied or at least posted. > And will demand that it therefore does not get removed. We've had about 3 of these in Debian since deciding to cut it from the upcoming release. (The kicker for us was the samba security update that wasn't tested with smbfs as a client.) The key regressions of interest relative to smbfs seem to be: - lack of DFS support - lack of netbios name resolution for UNC share names The former seems to be a kernel issue whose resolution is in progress, and I think the latter would have to be addressed in the userspace mount tools? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/