Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-178844-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 16:17:24 +0100
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com,
	bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com,
	"Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>, dfustini@baylibre.com,
	amitsinght@marvell.com, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Rex Nie <rex.nie@jaguarmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/35] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code
 to /fs/resctrl
Message-ID: <ZkOAhH6tm1NXpre2@e133380.arm.com>
References: <20240426150537.8094-1-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
 <b60aa6cc-7396-42c5-9a42-db8d6e8bfef6@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b60aa6cc-7396-42c5-9a42-db8d6e8bfef6@intel.com>

Hi Reinette,

On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:41:37AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On 4/26/2024 8:05 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > This is a respin of the resctrl refactoring series described below,
> > addressing review feedback.  Many thanks to those to responded with
> > feedback on the v1 series [2].
> > 
> > See Notes and FYIs in the individual patches for details on the changes
> > and outstanding issues.
> 
> What are your expectations regarding this series while considering [1] and [2]?
> 
> Reinette
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZiE8%2foXyjBef2qTy@e133380.arm.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/acce93e6-4c8e-472d-a2bc-5cbad2950661@intel.com/
> 

I plan to propose a reworked version of the fflags and string parser
stuff, and take a look at the other more minor outstanding issues.

The series does need rebasing, but otherwise I don't anticipate much
change to the code from the Arm side unless there are further review
comments.

Do you have a preference on how this series should proceed?

Cheers
---Dave