Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932268AbYAaIuk (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:50:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760124AbYAaIuc (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:50:32 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:42133 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760045AbYAaIub (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:50:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:50:13 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: travis@sgi.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: Use generic percpu linux-2.6.git Message-ID: <20080131085013.GB1585@elte.hu> References: <20080130180940.022172000@sgi.com> <20080130180940.921597000@sgi.com> <20080130215339.GC28242@elte.hu> <1201768346.18221.5.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1201768346.18221.5.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1179 Lines: 28 * Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * travis@sgi.com wrote: > > > > > Change s390 percpu.h to use asm-generic/percpu.h > > > > do the s390 maintainer agree with this change (Acks please), and has it > > been tested on s390? > > Now I'm confused. The patch has been acked a few weeks ago and the > last 5+ version of the patch had the acked line. The lastest version > dropped it for a reason I don't know. And more, the patch is already > upstream with the (correct) acked line, see git commit > f034347470e486835ccdcd7a5bb2ceb417be11c4. So, what is the problem ? the latest patch was sent without your acked line and i asked about that. But later on Mike told me that you acked it - so i restored the ack and the patch, Linus pulled the fixes and it now all is upstream and all architectures should be fine again now. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/