Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-178949-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 18:22:01 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
To: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>, 
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm/bridge: Add 'struct device *' field to the
 drm_bridge structure
Message-ID: <20240514-scarlet-corgi-of-efficiency-faf2bb@penduick>
References: <20240514154045.309925-1-sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha384;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dgblqp33k4x2lbe7"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240514154045.309925-1-sui.jingfeng@linux.dev>


--dgblqp33k4x2lbe7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:40:43PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> Because a lot of implementations has already added it into their drived
> class, promote it into drm_bridge core may benifits a lot. drm bridge is
> a driver, it should know the underlying hardware entity.

Is there some actual benefits, or is it theoretical at this point?

Maxime

--dgblqp33k4x2lbe7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iJUEABMJAB0WIQTkHFbLp4ejekA/qfgnX84Zoj2+dgUCZkOPpAAKCRAnX84Zoj2+
djLpAYCd28PWUhDWrhqkqi6BHUk9bT+cXJcAbMjeLgzcYs5NLe68uc4CGgzJJOpX
1OT5hikBfjD+kofCGPbLiRyVYR3LmtorahIMfw7JgdLmMERa3yPgYuEi33wzdVG7
H1XdJkSB4w==
=J0+X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dgblqp33k4x2lbe7--