Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-179042-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 19:14:30 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Kanak Shilledar <kanakshilledar@gmail.com>
Cc: wahrenst@gmx.net, Kanak Shilledar <kanakshilledar111@protonmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: spi: brcm,bcm2835-spi: convert to
 dtschema
Message-ID: <20240514-sitting-ritzy-498d35eb5ac8@spud>
References: <20240514070051.2959-1-kanakshilledar111@protonmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3dV2fBsKbC6sQUnx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240514070051.2959-1-kanakshilledar111@protonmail.com>


--3dV2fBsKbC6sQUnx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:30:47PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote:

> Changes in v3:
> - Updated DCO email address

I was really hoping you'd tell me why you'd not used the same email
address, rather than just sending another version. My ulterior motive is
that I wrote the section in email-clients.rst saying that protonmail had
WKD issues with kernel.org accounts but apparently proton added a
workaround and have yet to be sent an email that confirmed that the
workaround fixed things. (I'm not sure that the WKD issues ever applied
as there's no GPG key posted for conor+dt@kernel.org, only
conor@kernel.org).

The patch is fine IMO though, so
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.

--3dV2fBsKbC6sQUnx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZkOqBQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0kpvAQDcGvNDk6ZrW1c45wG/DoF5G4tLZYigtXDaEZsz4+u0CwD/UHy0NzAyHKuA
1U4VOiE4ctcuad3gUMsuD3QyXFSorwo=
=vpO3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3dV2fBsKbC6sQUnx--