Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-180505-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPM=9tw-53PCvveRcdLUUQ+mjq2X2er5zp6n1KeE8Nu8x=VP2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wge0et+3PP47OBnNx66Q=i_XgqfGfrSmDGHSyp=Jn-CgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=whTqHgXZ4Aj8dNO3Peg9Rf0sh2F7zGWRUOmBwfMDxgvbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wgWJCcJRLBZ1xoAATFyvp6YKN+qzrePhxQbN1SFrno7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wjm4BcsMrvgXocATBVvZ7N6LAjSvLTzTXWg9EFzyip_cA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPM=9twOiwquA7Zi_mr1vKFV4RQqhnbHv+c9Xz6BadF3tGEegw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9twOiwquA7Zi_mr1vKFV4RQqhnbHv+c9Xz6BadF3tGEegw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 10:06:27 +1000
Message-ID: <CAPM=9tyHnK_ReDmFf0eUGGuvKpXJQ0VWuKKhDqJt89URjOTU_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 6.10-rc1
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, 
	"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>, 
	=?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>, 
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, 
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 09:50, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 06:29, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 13:24, Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have to revert both
> > >
> > >   a68c7eaa7a8f ("drm/amdgpu: Enable clear page functionality")
> > >   e362b7c8f8c7 ("drm/amdgpu: Modify the contiguous flags behaviour")
> > >
> > > to make things build cleanly. Next step: see if it boots and fixes the
> > > problem for me.
> >
> > Well, perhaps not surprisingly, the WARN_ON() no longer triggers with
> > this, and everything looks fine.
> >
> > Let's see if the machine ends up being stable now. It took several
> > hours for the "scary messages" state to turn into the "hung machine"
> > state, so they *could* have been independent issues, but it seems a
> > bit unlikely.
>
> I think that should be fine to do for now.
>
> I think it is also fine to do like I've attached, but I'm not sure if
> I'd take that chance.

Scrap that idea, doesn't die, but it makes my system unhappy, like
fbdev missing,

so for quickest path forward, just make the two reverts seems best.

I've reproduced it here, so I'll track it down,

Dave.