Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-180760-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 09:27:13 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
	maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
	Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	igor.bagnucki@intel.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net 3/3] ice: map XDP queues to vectors in
 ice_vsi_map_rings_to_vectors()
Message-ID: <20240516082713.GC179178@kernel.org>
References: <20240515160246.5181-1-larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
 <20240515160246.5181-4-larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240515160246.5181-4-larysa.zaremba@intel.com>

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:02:16PM +0200, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> ice_pf_dcb_recfg() re-maps queues to vectors with
> ice_vsi_map_rings_to_vectors(), which does not restore the previous
> state for XDP queues. This leads to no AF_XDP traffic after rebuild.
> 
> Map XDP queues to vectors in ice_vsi_map_rings_to_vectors().
> Also, move the code around, so XDP queues are mapped independently only
> through .ndo_bpf().

Hi Larysa,

I take it the last sentence refers to the placement of ice_map_xdp_rings()
in ice_prepare_xdp_rings() after rather than before the
(cfg_type == ICE_XDP_CFG_PART) condition.

If so, I see that it is a small change. But I do wonder if it is separate
from fixing the issue described in the first paragraph. And thus would
be better as a separate patch.

Also, (I'm raising a separate issue :) breaking out logic into
ice_xdp_ring_from_qid() seems very nice.  But I wonder if this ought to be
part of a cleanup-patch for 'iwl' rather than a fixes patch for 'iwl-next'.

OTOH, I do see that breaking out ice_map_xdp_rings() makes sense in the
context of this fix as the same logic is to be called in two places.

Splitting patches aside, the resulting code looks good to me.

..