Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933092AbYAaQVW (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:21:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757783AbYAaQVI (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:21:08 -0500 Received: from smtp5.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.39]:48315 "EHLO smtp5.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757504AbYAaQVE (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:21:04 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:21:42 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: James Bottomley , Sam Ravnborg , davem@davemloft.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] kill hotplug init/exit section annotations Message-ID: <20080131162141.GC19700@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> References: <20080130200336.GN29368@does.not.exist> <1201726817.3292.84.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080130212011.GA26621@uranus.ravnborg.org> <1201729295.3292.94.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080130223219.GT29368@does.not.exist> <20080131074436.GA31966@uranus.ravnborg.org> <1201795051.3131.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080131081120.27505dc0@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080131081120.27505dc0@laptopd505.fenrus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1756 Lines: 47 On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:11:20AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:57:31 -0600 > James Bottomley wrote: > > > No-one seems to see much value in these, and they cause about 90% of > > our problems with __init/__exit markers, so simply eliminate them. > > Rather than run over the whole tree removing them, this patch > > #defines them to be nops. > > > > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley > > > > --- > > > > I'll probably be going after __exit after this one, but it makes sense > > to split them up, since the hotplug annotation removal looks > > uncontroversial, whereas __exit and discard section removal might > > produce more robust debate. I also think doing the hotplug removal > > gives us 90% of the benefits and removes 90% of the section mismatch > > problems. > > > Since hotplug is so fundamental nowadays the value no longer outweighs the pain/cost > to me, so Granted for normal hotplug. But my computer has neither CPU hotplug not memory hotplug, and I don't see the point for removing these annotations (and they are anyway not what causes problems in normal drivers). > Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/