Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-180898-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <12437901.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher> <5161bd95-d51e-49cc-bcbd-523fbb747e4b@redhat.com>
 <CAJZ5v0gf-oLcjT8dxnpjAyVfpUep5ST2mHDJy2dySBGCJwjMxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b53b4fe4-e3b7-4939-a8ea-9eb55f0bece6@redhat.com> <CAJZ5v0i+ejMyj0j7RvVY7+g6eU8bQ9QLG=08fm78i9Ui1fEiVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <2e5c9108-9ca4-4d7c-a062-2a9a5baaf06e@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e5c9108-9ca4-4d7c-a062-2a9a5baaf06e@redhat.com>
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 12:21:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ipB1aLCSv9NGukjW8u09qi628sHvgudReV4-=FvrCZMA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI: EC: Install EC address space handler at the
 namespace root
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, 
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, 
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>, Armin Wolf <w_armin@gmx.de>, 
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:14=E2=80=AFPM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com=
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 5/16/24 12:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:50=E2=80=AFAM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat=
com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 5/16/24 10:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:35=E2=80=AFAM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redh=
at.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/15/24 9:39 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is an update of
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/5787281.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> which was a follow up for the discussion in:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/CAJZ5v0hiXdv08PRcop7oSYqgr_g5rwz=
RTj7HgdNCCGjXeV44zA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Patch [1/2] has been updated to avoid possible issues related to
> >>>>> systems with defective platform firmware and patch [2/2] is a resen=
d
> >>>>> with a couple of tags added.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks, the series looks good to me:
> >>>>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> for the series.
> >>>>
> >>>> I assume you are going to send this in as a fix for 6.10 ?
> >>>
> >>> Yes, I am.
> >>>
> >>>> In that case feel free to merge both patches through the
> >>>> linux-pm tree.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you!
> >>
> >> Hmm, I just realized that this:
> >>
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers=
-x86.git/commit/?h=3Dfor-next&id=3Dc663b26972eae7d2a614f584c92a266fe9a2d44c
> >>
> >> Is part of the main pdx86 pull-request for 6.10 which I'm going to
> >> send to Linus in the next 10 minutes or so. So that is going to
> >> conflict with your 2/2.
> >>
> >> Options:
> >>
> >> a) You only send 1/2 upstream as a fix and I'll then send a rebased
> >> 2/2 upstream as part of the first pdx86 pull-request.
> >>
> >> b) You merge the git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/p=
latform-drivers-x86.git
> >> platform-drivers-x86-v6.10-1 tag (which is the tag for the pull-reques=
t
> >> I'm about to send to Linus) and rebase on top of that before sending
> >> a pull-request for both to Linus.
> >
> > I would rather wait for Linus to merge your PR and merge my changes on
> > top of his merge.
>
> That is fine too. I just send out the pull-request so hopefully Linus wil=
l
> merge it soon(ish).
>
> Note (stating the obvious) when rebasing 2/2 you will pretty much need to
> remove all the new code added by:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x8=
6.git/commit/?id=3Dc663b26972eae7d2a614f584c92a266fe9a2d44c

I see, thanks for the notice!