Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-181067-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPM=9tw-53PCvveRcdLUUQ+mjq2X2er5zp6n1KeE8Nu8x=VP2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=whxT8D_0j=bjtrvj-O=VEOjn6GW8GK4j2V+BiDUntZKAQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPM=9tyOtH24Mw_2X+bgV9iChOQV3LtmRCoR5x6KXhSUD6FjUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wh8DWSMrtuhZOzanfBCFcuJCihO9x7fkzx-dBhLddXF-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPM=9twCVkx9OqndCcvjjgx+P7ixBRwttiz25-R=bkycEo5vrQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=whuCX-NAGOLzwn5sObPDJX-pdqamZ7YTpHFHODAMv4P+A@mail.gmail.com> <87v83eb2sn.fsf@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <87v83eb2sn.fsf@intel.com>
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 09:04:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CADnq5_Nw_Tr5DABc3XGFpzQhePnVNGW-tzSZAQq0CL=s0iT8sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 6.10-rc1
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, 
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:42=E2=80=AFAM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.inte=
l.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2024, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote=
:
> > On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 16:17, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> AMDGPU, I915 and XE all have !COMPILE_TEST on their variants
> >
> > Hmm.  It turns out that I didn't notice the AMDGPU one because my
> > Threadripper - that has AMDGPU enabled - I have actually turned off
> > EXPERT on, so it's hidden by that for me.
> >
> > But yes, both of those should be "depends on !WERROR" too.
>
> Fair enough. Honestly it just didn't occur to me.
>
> The main goal here was to ensure the drm subsystem does not have any
> build warnings, but without halting CI on any non-drm warnings that
> might occasionally creep in and that we can't fix as quickly.
>
> If there was a way to somehow limit WERROR by subdirectories, without
> config options, I'd love to ditch the config.

Right.  Same thing for amdgpu.  Our CI was often breaking due to
-WERROR in other subsystems or with compiler updates.  Maybe it's
better now.

Alex


>
> > Or maybe they should just go away entirely, and be subsumed by the
> > DRM_WERROR thing.
>
> For i915, this was the idea anyway, we just haven't gotten around to it
> yet.
>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel