Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-181958-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 11:51:10 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, patches@lists.linux.dev,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Address clang -Wimplicit-fallthrough in
 vsprintf()
Message-ID: <20240517095110.GAZkcojmJQoY_zU-OT@fat_crate.local>
References: <20240516-x86-boot-fix-clang-implicit-fallthrough-v1-1-04dc320ca07c@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240516-x86-boot-fix-clang-implicit-fallthrough-v1-1-04dc320ca07c@kernel.org>

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 07:03:41AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough for the x86 boot code, clang
> warns:
> 
>   arch/x86/boot/printf.c:257:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
>     257 |                 case 'u':
>         |                 ^
> 
> Clang is a little more pedantic than GCC, which does not warn when
> falling through to a case that is just break or return.

Is anyone fixing Clang?

:-P

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette