Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-182214-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 16:40:18 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v5 06/30] printk: nbcon: Add callbacks to
 synchronize with driver
Message-ID: <ZkdsUjP9CLCdY0kw@pathway.suse.cz>
References: <20240502213839.376636-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
 <20240502213839.376636-7-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
 <ZkdcFxW-e9LVmMd8@pathway.suse.cz>
 <87bk54y1vl.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87bk54y1vl.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>

On Fri 2024-05-17 16:06:30, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2024-05-17, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> > BTW: I wonder if you use AI for generating the commit message.
> >      My experience is that AI produces longer fancy sentences
> >      which might be good for a novel but they sometimes hide
> >      the important details.
> 
> I do not know if that is a compliment or an insult.
> 
> For the record, I do not use AI. The "long fancy sentences hiding
> important details" are coming from a sober brain... mine.

Ah, take it as a complaint then ;-) Complicated things are just hard
to explain.

> > My attempt of a more strightforwward explanation:
> 
> [...]
> 
> Your version does not mention why the generic code now needs to use the
> driver-specific locking, but I suppose that does not matter (and only
> adds confusion instead of explanation).

I removed these details on purpose. I think that they will be
easier to understand with the code.

Best Regards,
Petr