Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-182802-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Message-ID: <8e56ea52-9e58-4291-8f7f-4721dd74c72f@ti.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 14:18:55 +0530
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: dp8386x: Add MIT license along with
 GPL-2.0
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
CC: <vigneshr@ti.com>, <nm@ti.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
        <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        <robh@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Kip Broadhurst <kbroadhurst@ti.com>,
        <w.egorov@phytec.de>
References: <20240517104226.3395480-1-u-kumar1@ti.com>
 <20240517-poster-purplish-9b356ce30248@spud>
 <20240517-fastball-stable-9332cae850ea@spud>
Content-Language: en-US
From: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240517-fastball-stable-9332cae850ea@spud>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Conor

On 5/17/2024 8:11 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:39:20PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:12:26PM +0530, Udit Kumar wrote:
>>> Modify license to include dual licensing as GPL-2.0-only OR MIT
>>> license for TI specific phy header files. This allows for Linux
>>> kernel files to be used in other Operating System ecosystems
>>> such as Zephyr or FreeBSD.
>> What's wrong with BSD-2-Clause, why not use that?
> I cut myself off, I meant to say:
> What's wrong with BSD-2-Clause, the standard dual license for
> bindings, why not use that?

want to be inline with License of top level DTS, which is including this 
header file

eg

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j722s-evm.dts#L1