Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934789AbYBABhw (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:37:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753241AbYBABhi (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:37:38 -0500 Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:45356 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965081AbYBABhY (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:37:24 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:37:21 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: clameter@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com To: Andrea Arcangeli cc: Robin Holt , Avi Kivity , Izik Eidus , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Peter Zijlstra , steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmu notifiers #v5 In-Reply-To: <20080131232842.GQ7185@v2.random> Message-ID: References: <20080131045750.855008281@sgi.com> <20080131171806.GN7185@v2.random> <20080131232842.GQ7185@v2.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 810 Lines: 19 On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I appreciate the review! I hope my entirely bug free and > strightforward #v5 will strongly increase the probability of getting > this in sooner than later. If something else it shows the approach I > prefer to cover GRU/KVM 100%, leaving the overkill mutex locking > requirements only to the mmu notifier users that can't deal with the > scalar and finegrined and already-taken/trashed PT lock. Mutex locking? Could you be more specific? I hope you will continue to do reviews of the other mmu notifier patchset? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/