Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932429AbYBAGKe (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 01:10:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751843AbYBAGKS (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 01:10:18 -0500 Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:37831 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750973AbYBAGKQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 01:10:16 -0500 Message-ID: <47A2B7C1.7070505@trash.net> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:10:09 +0100 From: Patrick McHardy User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071008) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Newall CC: David Miller , kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ole@ans.pl, cups-bugs@easysw.com, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: cups slow on linux-2.6.24 References: <47A21945.2050005@trash.net> <47A26C12.9020801@davidnewall.com> <20080131.181209.193710785.davem@davemloft.net> <47A2B71A.4090203@davidnewall.com> In-Reply-To: <47A2B71A.4090203@davidnewall.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 611 Lines: 14 David Newall wrote: > I'm not debating that checksums are wrong. The question was how and > where? It's not as if there are any unreliable communication paths in a > loopback interface, so it's surprising that they could be wrong. How? Where? > As I said, loopback doesn't perform full checksum calculation. Its simply an optimization, nothing to worry about ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/