Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-184127-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 14:49:42 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	cristian.marussi@arm.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com,
	imx@lists.linux.dev, aisheng.dong@nxp.com,
	Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties for i.MX95
 Pinctrl OEM extensions
Message-ID: <20240520194942.GA1374705-robh@kernel.org>
References: <20240516073012.1699795-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240516073012.1699795-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:30:12PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> i.MX95 Pinctrl is managed by System Control Management Interface(SCMI)
> firmware using OEM extensions. No functions, no groups are provided by
> the firmware. So add i.MX95 specific properties.
> 
> To keep aligned with current i.MX pinctrl bindings, still use "fsl,pins"
> for i.MX95.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> 
> V1:
>  There is already a v6 version for i.MX95 pinctrl with binding got reviewed by
>  Rob, https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240513-pinctrl-scmi-oem-v3-v6-1-904975c99cc4@nxp.com/
>  But after NXP internal discussion, to keep "fsl,pins" for i.MX95 would make
>  it aligned with current i.MX93/8M/7 bindings which people are familiar with,
>  and easy to understand.
> 
>  Sorry to bring back so late after your reviewing in previous generic binding
>  patch. This is not to reject the v6 patch, just wanna to see whether you are
>  happy with "fsl,pins" for i.MX95. If people are happy to accept, I will post
>  out driver together with this patch in new patchset to reject v6. If people are
>  not happy, we could continue with v6.

It is fine for me.

Rob