Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-185000-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 15:15:43 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Sky Huang <SkyLake.Huang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
	Qingfang Deng <dqfext@gmail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Steven Liu <Steven.Liu@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] net: phy: mediatek: Introduce
 mtk-phy-lib and add 2.5Gphy support
Message-ID: <80186a3c-8e9a-4a7e-9ead-6773c0bf0ebf@lunn.ch>
References: <20240521101548.9286-1-SkyLake.Huang@mediatek.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240521101548.9286-1-SkyLake.Huang@mediatek.com>

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 06:15:43PM +0800, Sky Huang wrote:
> From: "SkyLake.Huang" <skylake.huang@mediatek.com>
> 
> e-organize MTK ethernet phy drivers and integrate common manipulations
> into mtk-phy-lib. Also, add support for build-in 2.5Gphy on MT7988.
> 
> v2:
> - Apply correct PATCH tag.
> - Break LED/Token ring/Extend-link-pulse-time features into 3 patches.
> - Fix contents according to v1 comments.
> 
> v3:
> - Fix patch 4/5 & 5/5. Please see changes in 4/5 & 5/5's commit log.
> - Rebase code and now this patch series can apply to net-next tree.
> 
> v4:
> - Fix patch 4/5 & 5/5. Please see changes in 4/5 & 5/5's commit log.

Please slow down. Discussion on the previous version has not come to a
conclusion yet. Posting a new version just wastes reviewer time.

Also, we are in the merge window at the moment, so nothing is going to
get merged until it closes.

	Andrew