Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758095AbYBAKhr (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:37:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754609AbYBAKhk (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:37:40 -0500 Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.171.30]:33097 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754192AbYBAKhj (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:37:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 04:37:38 -0600 From: Robin Holt To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Robin Holt , Andrea Arcangeli , Avi Kivity , Izik Eidus , kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Peter Zijlstra , steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges Message-ID: <20080201103737.GI26420@sgi.com> References: <20080131045750.855008281@sgi.com> <20080131045812.785269387@sgi.com> <20080201042408.GG26420@sgi.com> <20080201103221.GH26420@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080201103221.GH26420@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1415 Lines: 39 On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:32:21AM -0600, Robin Holt wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:43:58PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Robin Holt wrote: > > > > > > Index: linux-2.6/mm/memory.c > > > ... > > > > @@ -1668,6 +1678,7 @@ gotten: > > > > page_cache_release(old_page); > > > > unlock: > > > > pte_unmap_unlock(page_table, ptl); > > > > + mmu_notifier(invalidate_range_end, mm, 0); > > > > > > I think we can get an _end call without the _begin call before it. > > > > If that would be true then also the pte would have been left locked. > > > > We always hit unlock. Maybe I just do not see it? > > Maybe I haven't looked closely enough, but let's start with some common > assumptions. Looking at do_wp_page from 2.6.24 (I believe that is what > my work area is based upon). On line 1559, the function begins being > declared. > > On lines 1614 and 1630, we do "goto unlock" where the _end callout is > soon made. The _begin callout does not come until after those branches > have been taken (occurs on line 1648). > > Thanks, > Robin Ignore this thread, I am going to throw a patch against the new version. Thanks, Robin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/