Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-184877-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 14:26:54 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Gia <giacomo.gio@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6hmke?= <benjamin@boehmke.net>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
	Christian Heusel <christian@heusel.eu>,
	Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel@micha.zone" <kernel@micha.zone>,
	Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
	Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
	Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"S, Sanath" <Sanath.S@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] "xHCI host controller not responding,
 assume dead" on stable kernel > 6.8.7
Message-ID: <20240521112654.GP1421138@black.fi.intel.com>
References: <lqdpk7lopqq4jn22mycxgg6ps4yfs7hcca33tqb2oy6jxc2y7p@rhjjbzs6wigu>
 <611f8200-8e0e-40e4-aff4-cc2c55dc6354@amd.com>
 <61-664b6880-3-6826fc80@79948770>
 <20240520162100.GI1421138@black.fi.intel.com>
 <5d-664b8000-d-70f82e80@161590144>
 <CAHe5sWazL96zPa-v9S515ciE46JLZ1ROL7gmGikfn-vhUoDaZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240521051151.GK1421138@black.fi.intel.com>
 <CAHe5sWb7kHurBvu6JC6OgXZm9mSg5a2W2XK9L8gCygYaFZz7JQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240521085926.GO1421138@black.fi.intel.com>
 <CAHe5sWb=14MWvQc1xkyrkct2Y9jn=-dKgX55Cow_9VKEeapFwA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAHe5sWb=14MWvQc1xkyrkct2Y9jn=-dKgX55Cow_9VKEeapFwA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 11:12:10AM +0200, Gia wrote:
> Here you have the output from the dock upstream port:
> 
> sudo tbdump -r 2 -a 1 -vv -N2 LANE_ADP_CS_0
> 
> 0x0036 0x003c013e 0b00000000 00111100 00000001 00111110 .... LANE_ADP_CS_0
>   [00:07]       0x3e Next Capability Pointer
>   [08:15]        0x1 Capability ID
>   [16:19]        0xc Supported Link Speeds
>   [20:21]        0x3 Supported Link Widths (SLW)
>   [22:23]        0x0 Gen 4 Asymmetric Support (G4AS)
>   [26:26]        0x0 CL0s Support
>   [27:27]        0x0 CL1 Support
>   [28:28]        0x0 CL2 Support
> 0x0037 0x0828003c 0b00001000 00101000 00000000 00111100 .... LANE_ADP_CS_1
>   [00:03]        0xc Target Link Speed → Router shall attempt Gen 3 speed
>   [04:05]        0x3 Target Link Width → Establish a Symmetric Link
>   [06:07]        0x0 Target Asymmetric Link → Establish Symmetric Link
>   [10:10]        0x0 CL0s Enable
>   [11:11]        0x0 CL1 Enable
>   [12:12]        0x0 CL2 Enable
>   [14:14]        0x0 Lane Disable (LD)
>   [15:15]        0x0 Lane Bonding (LB)
>   [16:19]        0x8 Current Link Speed → Gen 2
>   [20:25]        0x2 Negotiated Link Width → Symmetric Link (x2)
>   [26:29]        0x2 Adapter State → CL0
>   [30:30]        0x0 PM Secondary (PMS)

Hmm, okay both sides announce support of Gen3 yet the link is Gen2 which
makes me still suspect the cable, or the connection in general. I
suggest, if you have, try with another Thunderbolt cable.