Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-185491-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 22:47:01 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Amrit Anand <quic_amrianan@quicinc.com>,
	Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
	Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
	Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>,
	"Humphreys, Jonathan" <j-humphreys@ti.com>,
	Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.org>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>,
	boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/9] dt-bindings: board: Introduce board-id
Message-ID: <20240521-reroute-drainer-af9c5b80afa3@spud>
References: <20240521-board-ids-v3-0-e6c71d05f4d2@quicinc.com>
 <20240521-board-ids-v3-2-e6c71d05f4d2@quicinc.com>
 <20240521-bonfire-backboned-9ef33c10d447@spud>
 <20240521-unskilled-spindle-c4161092ae83@spud>
 <CAL_JsqJjvNfr_Vo7JNsBn6Fcv5r--ZqQTiforSLwrZ-z4_mURQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HYLZW+tE+PSJkClw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJjvNfr_Vo7JNsBn6Fcv5r--ZqQTiforSLwrZ-z4_mURQ@mail.gmail.com>


--HYLZW+tE+PSJkClw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 04:32:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

> boot-architecture is not private[0]. It is where EBBR gets discussed
> amongst other things. This came up in a thread there[1].

I dunno man, in my book any mailing list that rejects non-member mails
is private. Or outright broken, take your pick :)

I don't care if a private list's subscribers miss part of the discussion,
but it's list owner probably should, whoever that may be.

> [0] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman3/lists/boot-architecture.lists.linaro.org/
> [1] https://lists.linaro.org/archives/list/boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org/thread/DZCZSOCRH5BN7YOXEL2OQKSDIY7DCW2M/

--HYLZW+tE+PSJkClw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZk0WVQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0pwFAQDFFUs7sBteTrPNKO67mthOWORfHlXs8gaDDSsN/GgjpAEAm2mi3SFSxt12
Gy0Yt4cta4KwcbUmXjcpHVs1u1+XEw0=
=IEN1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HYLZW+tE+PSJkClw--