Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757630AbYBAOtd (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:49:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755153AbYBAOt0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:49:26 -0500 Received: from saeurebad.de ([85.214.36.134]:51786 "EHLO saeurebad.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752344AbYBAOtZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:49:25 -0500 From: Johannes Weiner To: Andrew Morton Cc: Sam Ravnborg , LKML , linux arch , James Bottomley Subject: Re: Are Section mismatches out of control? References: <20080201104718.GA11717@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080201030329.9b760777.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:48:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20080201030329.9b760777.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Fri, 1 Feb 2008 03:03:29 -0800") Message-ID: <87y7a4wx4k.fsf@saeurebad.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 570 Lines: 18 Hi, Andrew Morton writes: > Question is: why do people keep adding new ones when they are so easy to > detect and fix? > > Asnwer: because neither they nor their patch integrators are doing adequate > compilation testing. How about adding an Untested-by tag for psychological reasons? Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/