Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-187572-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 15:23:35 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock Enclave
Message-ID: <Zk9DV6Ko-KO0kym_@pengutronix.de>
References: <20240523-imx-se-if-v2-0-5a6fd189a539@nxp.com>
 <20240523-imx-se-if-v2-4-5a6fd189a539@nxp.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240523-imx-se-if-v2-4-5a6fd189a539@nxp.com>

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 04:19:35PM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> NXP hardware IP(s) for secure-enclaves like Edgelock Enclave(ELE),
> are embedded in the SoC to support the features like HSM, SHE & V2X,
> using message based communication interface.
> 
> The secure enclave FW communicates on a dedicated messaging unit(MU)
> based interface(s) with application core, where kernel is running.
> It exists on specific i.MX processors. e.g. i.MX8ULP, i.MX93.
> 
> This patch adds the driver for communication interface to secure-enclave,
> for exchanging messages with NXP secure enclave HW IP(s) like EdgeLock
> Enclave (ELE) from Kernel-space, used by kernel management layers like
> - DM-Crypt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/imx/Kconfig        |  12 +
>  drivers/firmware/imx/Makefile       |   2 +
>  drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.c | 286 +++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/firmware/imx/ele_base_msg.h |  92 +++++++
>  drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.c   | 239 ++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/firmware/imx/ele_common.h   |  43 +++
>  drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.c      | 531 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/firmware/imx/se_ctrl.h      |  99 +++++++
>  include/linux/firmware/imx/se_api.h |  14 +
>  9 files changed, 1318 insertions(+)

[...]

> 
> +int imx_ele_msg_send(struct se_if_priv *priv, void *tx_msg)
> +{
> +	struct se_msg_hdr *header;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	header = (struct se_msg_hdr *) tx_msg;
> +
> +	if (header->tag == priv->cmd_tag)
> +		lockdep_assert_held(&priv->se_if_cmd_lock);
> +
> +	scoped_guard(mutex, &priv->se_if_lock);

scoped_guard() with an empty block doesn't make much sense. Either use
scope_guard() { /* do something locked */ }; or guard().

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |