Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-187761-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 11:59:25 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] arch/fault: don't print logs for pte marker
 poison errors
Message-ID: <Zk9n3aXbOufWpAhn@x1n>
References: <20240510182926.763131-1-axelrasmussen@google.com>
 <20240510182926.763131-2-axelrasmussen@google.com>
 <Zj51rEwZeSK4Vr1G@x1n>
 <ZkPJCc5N1Eotpa4u@localhost.localdomain>
 <ZkPY4CSnZWZnxjTa@x1n>
 <ZkSMv31Cwx080no7@localhost.localdomain>
 <Zk5noUEYI4lknyJy@x1n>
 <Zk6zLRimo6Q6ZrwM@localhost.localdomain>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Zk6zLRimo6Q6ZrwM@localhost.localdomain>

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 05:08:29AM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 05:46:09PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > Now, ProcessB still has the page mapped, so upon re-accessing it,
> > > it will trigger a new MCE event. memory-failure code will see that this
> > 
> > The question is why accessing that hwpoison entry from ProcB triggers an
> > MCE.  Logically that's a swap entry and it should generate a page fault
> > rather than MCE.  Then in the pgfault hanlder we don't need that encoded
> > pfn as we have vmf->address.
> 
> It would be a swap entry if we reach try_to_umap_one() without trouble.
> Then we have the code that converts it:
> 
>  ...
>  if (PageHWPoison(p))
>          pteval = swp_entry_to_pte(make_hwpoison_entry(subpage));
> 	 set_{huge_}pte_at
>  ...
> 
> But maybe we could only do that for ProcA, while ProcB failed to do that,
> which means that for ProcA that is a hwpoisoned-swap-entry, but ProcB still
> has this page mapped as usual, so if ProcB re-access it, that will not
> trigger a fault (because the page is still mapped in its pagetables).

But in that case "whether encode pfn in hwpoison swap entry" doesn't matter
either.. as it's not yet converted to a swap entry, so the pfn is there.

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu