Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-187784-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Message-ID: <865295e7-30c8-4abf-9992-fcb9b3186ebb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 18:31:32 +0200
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: DT schema bindings conversion mentorships (was Re: [PATCH v5]
 ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema)
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
 Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, Julia Lawall
 <julia.lawall@inria.fr>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
 =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A9ter_Ujfalusi?= <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>,
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240522075245.388-1-bavishimithil@gmail.com>
 <0594944d-c158-4840-8724-b3f2edaab1ca@gmail.com>
 <4f722e53-011f-4176-b6af-080522165007@kernel.org>
 <bb44d588-9316-4509-b545-9bbaa2d240cb@gmail.com>
 <3c6c5be1-fb8e-4bf0-9f58-cfb09672e8c1@kernel.org>
 <d999bc26-9bb1-44a8-92a3-bcbe14c5a1c3@gmail.com>
 <58ada5ce-5c02-4ff5-8bdd-d6556c9d141f@kernel.org>
 <60989c44-6d16-4698-bf3f-b3c5dcd7b3e0@kernel.org>
 <dc31c4ba-1bea-4056-a68f-87d742eb8da3@nxp.com>
 <CAL_JsqJp133hGSkja9tabtsE9D7MSA9JErVkmkcy91piHMgfwg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US, de-AT
From: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqJp133hGSkja9tabtsE9D7MSA9JErVkmkcy91piHMgfwg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 23/05/2024 18:24, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 7:30 AM Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/22/24 20:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Dear Daniel, Shuah, Julia, Javier and other mentorship managers,
>>>
>>> I see some contributions regarding Devicetree bindings which look like
>>> efforts of some mentorship programs. It's great, I really like it. Only
>>> sadness is that no one ever asked us, Devicetree maintainers, about some
>>> sort of guidelines. This leads to sub-optimal allocation of tasks and
>>> quite a strain on reviewers side: for example we receive contributions
>>> which were never tested (tested as in make target - make
>>> dt_binding_check). Or people converted bindings which really do not
>>> matter thus their work soon will become obsolete.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> Some of the faulty patches are on me! Sorry for that. We had an
>> unexpected high
>>
>> number of people sending contributions for Google Summer of Code and I
>> couldn't watch them all.
>>
>> Now, the application period has ended and we have 1 intern working for
>> the summer!
>>
>> Will follow your guidance! Thanks a lot for your help!
> 
> To be specific, there are several ways to prioritize what to work on.
> 
> - There's a list maintained in CI of number of occurrences of
> undocumented (by schema) compatibles[1]. Start at the top.
> - Pick a platform (or family of platform) and get the warnings down to
> 0 or close. There's a grouping of warnings and undocumented
> compatibles by platform family at the same link.
> - Prioritize newer platforms over older (arm64 rather than
> arm32(though there's still new arm32 stuff)).
> - Fix warnings treewide from common schemas (i.e. from dtschema).
> That's not conversions, but related.
> 
> Rob
> 
> [1] https://gitlab.com/robherring/linux-dt/-/jobs/6918723853

Thank you Rob, I forwarded your recommendations to the LFX mentees.

Best regards,
Javier Carrasco