Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-187974-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 21:33:39 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, linux-fsi@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Eddie James <eajames@linux.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	Lakshmi Yadlapati <lakshmiy@us.ibm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v6 17/20] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add IBM Huygens BMC system
Message-ID: <20240523203339.GS2118490@ZenIV>
References: <20240522192524.3286237-18-eajames@linux.ibm.com>
 <2fe45df6-01a2-488b-99fb-5ee20491554c@web.de>
 <910b18b7-3717-4087-b028-fcaf5f2a604b@linux.ibm.com>
 <398bf753-6701-4925-b814-781a68a75cc5@web.de>
 <20240523-rinse-sturdily-7c78d8517884@spud>
 <d6289d1c-deae-49a3-9fc9-98a2f2e57802@web.de>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d6289d1c-deae-49a3-9fc9-98a2f2e57802@web.de>
Sender: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:46:48PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Would you like to mention in the changelog that a hardware description
> >> should be extended anyhow?
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n94
> >
> > You are talking absolute crap here. Stop harassing contributors with
> > your inane comments.
> 
> Why do you interpret my patch review contributions in this direction
> when the official Linux development documentation provides special advice
> on affected wording details?

Your "contributions" are garbage in general, and this thread is not an exception.
More specifically, you are picking an advice that is inapplicable, transforming
it into a question and "contributing" the result.

And your entire modus operandi fits that pattern - you spew random garbage and
expect the contributors to spend their time and efforts on checking if your
(contents-free) "advice" happens to make any sense.

That.  Is.  Worthless.

According to people who'd met you in person you *are* a member of our species,
and I can't exclude the possibility that in some other environments you might
be capable of sentience.  Unfortunately, the kernel development is clearly
not among those.