Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 07:51:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 07:50:49 -0500 Received: from samba.sourceforge.net ([198.186.203.85]:29709 "HELO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 07:50:34 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:49:27 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-B1 results Message-ID: <20020106124927.GA30292@krispykreme> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ingo, I got your scheduler rewrite going on ppc64. Here are some initial LMbench results with sched-O1-2.4.17-B4.patch. Bear in mind the two machines are different chips (one is Power3 and the other is RS64), so some differences will result: 2 way (POWER3) summary: signal handling down a bit (GOOD) fork down a lot (very GOOD) exec, sh down (GOOD) context switches all down (GOOD) communication latencies: Pipe, AF, TCP slightly up (BAD) pipe bandwidth up (GOOD) 4 way (RS64) summary: stat up a bit (BAD) fork down a lot (very GOOD) exec, sh down (GOOD) context switches same or down (GOOD) communication latencies: Pipe, AF, TCP slightly up (BAD) pipe bandwidth up (GOOD) So far things look good. Next up I'll look at how it scales on the 12 way. Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/