Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763928AbYBBGNn (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 01:13:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752860AbYBBGNe (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 01:13:34 -0500 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:55803 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750810AbYBBGNd (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 01:13:33 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:16:12 -0600 From: Paul Jackson To: Max Krasnyanskiy Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, srostedt@redhat.com, ghaskins@novell.com Subject: Re: Integrating cpusets and cpu isolation [was Re: [CPUISOL] CPU isolation extensions] Message-Id: <20080202001612.98354ff2.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <47A21C53.2010502@qualcomm.com> References: <1201493382-29804-1-git-send-email-maxk@qualcomm.com> <1201511305.6149.30.camel@lappy> <20080128085910.7d38e9f5.pj@sgi.com> <479E20DA.2080403@qualcomm.com> <20080128130637.60db148e.pj@sgi.com> <47A21C53.2010502@qualcomm.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1415 Lines: 35 Max wrote: > Here is the list of things of issues with sched_load_balance flag from CPU isolation > perspective: A separate thread happened to start up on lkml.org, shortly after yours, that went into this in considerable detail. For example, the interaction of cpusets, sched_load_balance, sched_domains and real time scheduling is examined in some detail on this thread. Everyone participating on that thread learned something (we all came into it with less than a full picture of what's there.) I would encourage you to read it closely. For example, the scheduler code should not be trying to access per-cpuset attributes such as the sched_load_balance flag (you are correct that this would be difficult to do because of the locking; however by design, that is not to be done.) This thread begins at: scheduler scalability - cgroups, cpusets and load-balancing http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/29/60 Too bad we didn't think to include you in the CC list of that thread from the beginning. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/