Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765061AbYBBI0n (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 03:26:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757250AbYBBI0h (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 03:26:37 -0500 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:1667 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757138AbYBBI0g (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 03:26:36 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:44:06 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: David Newall Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4: Back-port of pl2303.c from 2.6.23.14 Message-ID: <20080202074406.GA31516@1wt.eu> References: <479A83DE.8020002@davidnewall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <479A83DE.8020002@davidnewall.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1613 Lines: 38 Hi David, I've CC'd Greg, author of the driver. On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:20:38AM +1030, David Newall wrote: > I experienced major major data loss on a PL-2303 USB-serial converter > under 2.4.36, which I remedied by back-porting the pl2303.c from the > latest 2.6 kernel tree. I'm OK to merge your work in 2.4.36.1 if it fixes bugs for you. I would have hoped a little more feedback from other users, but let's face it, people using USB are most often on desktops running 2.6. I've noticed your other mail about the buffer overflow (which does not sound like an overflow as we call it in security terms, so it's not critical). It would be better to merge your work with the fix in it, but I'll wait for the fix to be in 2.6 first (so that people upgrading from 2.4 to 2.6 never experience a regression). If this buffer overflow was not present in 2.4 driver but only in 2.6 (and in the backport), I'd rather wait in order not to break behaviour for current users of the driver. If both have the same bug, and if Greg is OK, then let's merge your work as a first evolution before a common fix. Based on the above conditions, I'd like you to tell Greg and I if you consider it worth to merge this backport in 2.4 now. From my point of view, your work looks OK but I want your feedback as a user (and not as the backporter), then Greg's approval. Thanks, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/