Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760740AbYBBNL0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:11:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756803AbYBBNLV (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:11:21 -0500 Received: from hawking.rebel.net.au ([203.20.69.83]:33821 "EHLO hawking.rebel.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753669AbYBBNLV (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:11:21 -0500 Message-ID: <47A46BF8.6030306@davidnewall.com> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 23:41:20 +1030 From: David Newall User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Willy Tarreau CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4: Back-port of pl2303.c from 2.6.23.14 References: <479A83DE.8020002@davidnewall.com> <20080202074406.GA31516@1wt.eu> In-Reply-To: <20080202074406.GA31516@1wt.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 908 Lines: 19 Hi Willy, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Based on the above conditions, I'd like you to tell Greg and I if you > consider it worth to merge this backport in 2.4 now. From my point of > view, your work looks OK but I want your feedback as a user (and not > as the backporter), then Greg's approval. The data loss I experienced did go away with the back-port, but I think that was because of the bigger buffers, rather than any true fix. Other than the extra product ids, it won't really change anything. I'm hoping the additional work I've done since then will correct the underlying fault. (Wish I could get some feedback on it.) I'd be happy for you to wait for that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/