Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761441AbYBBNdD (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:33:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753576AbYBBNcx (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:32:53 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:22028 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752692AbYBBNcw (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:32:52 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LkcKyO22LdMfaxlvsBucPKd9bMoWadPMVSWDkhxhTKW8Zg9dah6h7XKGqHSfAa4lSOhszZ36/KfZ+4ivto/LRxhcu6U9l0v5jBj794wwDYydTU1JlaNDK3r1ss1gwKYcbaMoetydmxFaa/oI91Ahs5cIg5rims1swd7WzKC7ll4= Message-ID: <47A470F9.9060708@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:32:41 +0100 From: Franck Bui-Huu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Split list.h and move rcu-protected lists into rculist.h References: <478FBEA0.9090203@gmail.com> <478FBEEA.6040000@gmail.com> <20080201155826.a2d308c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080201155826.a2d308c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1219 Lines: 35 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:47:38 +0100 > Franck Bui-Huu wrote: > >> This patch moves rcu-protected lists from list.h into a new header >> file rculist.h. > > I'm getting way too many compilation errors from this, perhaps because of > new rcu-list usages which weren't present in the old tree (ie: current > Linus mainline) which you tested it against. > Not really suprising, sorry for the mess. > The most practical way to prepare a patch like this is to either make it > back-compatible (for a while at least) or to prepare and carefully test it > against latest -mm. That way you'll pick up everyone's new code. > I'll try to come up with something better: if rculist helpers are used from list.h then issue a warning otherwise every thing is fine since the helpers are imported from rculist.h. Do you think it's better ? In the meanwhile, could you drop the patches related to rculist from mm tree ? Thanks Franck -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/