Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-190746-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1714049455.git.lduboin@freebox.fr>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1714049455.git.lduboin@freebox.fr>
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 15:43:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaM1pxweCPmhg5iQKgVVYBij4fZ7OUf-HRKvPeBJg49uw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] pinctrl: core: fix untreated named gpio ranges
 in pinctrl_pins_show()
To: =?UTF-8?Q?L=C3=A9o_DUBOIN?= <lduboin@freebox.fr>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 6:26=E2=80=AFPM L=C3=A9o DUBOIN <lduboin@freebox.fr=
> wrote:

> This series covers errors I encountered with the pinctrl_pins_show()
> function when dealing with named gpio ranges generated through the
> device tree using 'gpio-ranges-group-names'.
>
> These errors were introduced with the original implementation in
> f1b206cf7c57561ea156798f323b0541a783bd2f.
>
> L=C3=A9o DUBOIN (2):
>   pinctrl: core: take into account the pins array in pinctrl_pins_show()
>   pinctrl: core: reset gpio_device in loop in pinctrl_pins_show()

Patches applied for kernel v6.11.

It's debugfs so per definition no regression, people get to test it
in linux-next.

Thanks for looking into this!

Yours,
Linus Walleij