Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 08:41:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 08:41:30 -0500 Received: from NILE.GNAT.COM ([205.232.38.5]:16814 "HELO nile.gnat.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 6 Jan 2002 08:41:10 -0500 From: dewar@gnat.com To: dewar@gnat.com, gdr@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, trini@kernel.crashing.org, velco@fadata.bg Message-Id: <20020106134110.62076F2FA1@nile.gnat.com> Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 08:41:10 -0500 (EST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>Isn't the incriminated construct already outside of C and non-portable? The issue is not whether it is outside standard-C here, which of course it is, but rather whether there is some extension to GNU-C (either an interpretation of undefined or implementation defined, or an attribute etc) which wuld make it inside GNU-C even if outside C, and therefore portable to GNU-C, which is good enough for this purpose. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/