Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-191709-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
To: konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
	robh@kernel.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org,
	dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org,
	Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm4450: Add cpufreq support
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 22:32:33 -0500
Message-ID: <171686715154.523693.6573813091229179379.b4-ty@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240513093648.1746336-1-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
References: <20240513093648.1746336-1-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


On Mon, 13 May 2024 17:36:48 +0800, Tengfei Fan wrote:
> Qualcomm platforms making use of CPUFreq HW Engine (EPSS/OSM) supply
> clocks to the CPU cores. But this relationship is not represented in DTS
> so far.
> So let's make cpufreq node as the clock provider and CPU nodes as the
> consumers. The clock index for each CPU node is based on the frequency
> domain index.
> Also add a description of a SM4450 cpufreq-epss controller and references
> to it from CPU nodes.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: sm4450: Add cpufreq support
      commit: 15476ccd3dc6cea04048d159115c86a3d5042501

Best regards,
-- 
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>