Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-191729-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAE4VaREzY+a2PvQJYJbfh8DwB4OP7kucZG-e28H22xyWob1w_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <5b79732b-087c-411f-a477-9b837566673e@leemhuis.info> <20240524132008.6b6f69f6@gandalf.local.home>
 <CAE4VaRF80OhnaiqeP9STfLa5pORB31YSorgoJ92fQ8tsRovxqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE4VaRGaNJSdo474joOtKEkxkfmyJ-zsrr8asb7ojP2JexFt-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <2024052710-marsupial-debug-febd@gregkh> <20240527174424.75625921@rorschach.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20240527174424.75625921@rorschach.local.home>
From: =?UTF-8?B?SWxra2EgTmF1bGFww6TDpA==?= <digirigawa@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 07:08:03 +0300
Message-ID: <CAE4VaRGzvMU7ZuNwHq1SE0t+Z02Aa5QO44tBH8YgvSYX5ByRwg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in Kernel 6.8.x, 6.9.x Causing Trace/Panic During Shutdown/Reboot
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, 
	"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info>, 
	Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>, stable@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I tried 6.10-rc1 and it still ends up to panic

--Ilkka


On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:44=E2=80=AFAM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.or=
g> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 May 2024 20:14:42 +0200
> Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 07:40:21PM +0300, Ilkka Naulap=C3=A4=C3=A4 wrot=
e:
> > > Hi Steven,
> > >
> > > I took some time and bisected the 6.8.9 - 6.8.10 and git gave the
> > > panic inducing commit:
> > >
> > > 414fb08628143 (tracefs: Reset permissions on remount if permissions a=
re options)
> > >
> > > I reverted that commit to 6.9.2 and now it only serves the trace but
> > > the panic is gone. But I can live with it.
> >
> > Steven, should we revert that?
> >
> > Or is there some other change that we should take to resolve this?
> >
>
> Before we revert it (as it may be a bug in mainline), Ilkka, can you
> test v6.10-rc1?  If it exists there, it will let me know whether or not
> I missed something.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve