Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-192142-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 03:55:29 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] fhandle: expose u64 mount id to
 name_to_handle_at(2)
Message-ID: <ZlW4IWMYxtwbeI7I@infradead.org>
References: <20240523-exportfs-u64-mount-id-v2-1-f9f959f17eb1@cyphar.com>
 <ZlMADupKkN0ITgG5@infradead.org>
 <20240526.184753-detached.length.shallow.contents-jWkMukeD7VAC@cyphar.com>
 <ZlRy7EBaV04F2UaI@infradead.org>
 <20240527133430.ifjo2kksoehtuwrn@quack3>
 <ZlSzotIrVPGrC6vt@infradead.org>
 <20240528-wachdienst-weitreichend-42f8121bf764@brauner>
 <ZlWVkJwwJ0-B-Zyl@infradead.org>
 <20240528-gesell-evakuieren-899c08cbfa06@brauner>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240528-gesell-evakuieren-899c08cbfa06@brauner>

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:17:58AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> As I've said earlier, independent of the new handle type returning the
> new mount id is useful and needed because it allows the caller to
> reliably generate a mount fd for use with open_by_handle_at() via
> statmount(). That won't be solved by a new handle type and is racy with
> the old mount id. So I intend to accept a version of this patch.

The whole point is that with the fsid in the handle we do not even need
a mount fd for open_by_handle_at.

If you insist on making this interface even more crappy than it is and
create confusion please record my explicit:

Nacked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

in the commit :(